Content
1. "I reviewed the rule of three or writing an EQ"2.Review the following EQs
a. What is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?
- I believe this follows the rules of three because it's not a yes or no question, it allows some space for an opinion and argument against the question, and the format is good. For example rule#2 Takes a Stance: the author could argue that diet pills are bad and an audience member could counter argue.
b. What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?
- I believe the format kind of threw me off ,my revision of the EQ would be : What are the most important factors to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation? Other than that the EQ fallows
the other rules.
c.What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?
-I could see this EQ passing only rule 2, the format needs a little fixing and I feel like "what is most important ..." is a bit confusing , it doesn't sound right, it makes your EQ a bit confusing.
d. How can an Anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?
- This EQ passes the rule of three because its specific and direct and it allows people to argue, if they thing the author answer is wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment